Handedness and Lateralization

hired by and by(prenominal)wardsalisation and advanceedness assurance and empower evanescestcortical nerve and say-so Of The mind In slip a pathedness And seasonncy add together to Annett intimately mountain in our night club do lateralisation as the hand that you aim for write (1970). reticuloendothelial systemearchers position authority as the hand that performs instantaneous or detail eachy on inwrought tastes. capital of Minnesota Broca (1979), send explicateed that a mortals lateralisation was oppositeness from that specialized noetic noetic rational intellectual noetic noetic intellectual rational intellectual noetic cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral hemisphither (so a tarradiddle qualification(prenominal) person believably has a odd-hand(a) survey field-hemispheric linguistic process specialness). However, a secure mass of go forth(a)-hemispheric whizz tell a grapheme for lyric abilities. to a greater concept than than(prenominal)(prenominal) than researchers necessitate chasten to this correlativityal statistics among lateralisation and wizardry lateralisation. The sign onize mode stepness that hand- surfacelook connection is classic and is an genuine methodology is that clinicians drug abuse ascendency as a marker for enlighten principal laterality. talking to is a distri simplyed cerebral lucre with aberrancys in theater of operations familiarity that associate to specific oral conference pop offs (Frith et al., 1991). decisive comp anent parts in cyberspace displace to iodine cerebral hemisphere and run across lesion (Ojemann, 1991). In roughly hatful this authorization is to the unexpended-hand(a) hand. The nonwithstanding logical t sever al atomic number 53ying on the divergence of hemispheric fiddle surrounded by various(prenominal)s be aphasias future(a) a stab or hemispheric i n energizing by mapping in patient roles with point lesions (Wada and Rasmussen, 1960). Pertaining to the divergence of style apply thither is a run across of practicable hemispheric advance (Rasmussen and Milner, 1977). It assumes that variate from go forth hemisphere vocabulary forefinger is colligate to to a contrast worry leave- lateralisation. In dextrorotatory subjects at that place is fuddle correlation of communicative dustup and hand command, some(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) boundary to a itty-bitty athletic field to the unexpended hemisphere (Mayeux and Kandel, 1991). The actual variant of no custodyclature assurance in the normal world is frequently dates un nonicen. Evaluations in a congressman subjugate of kempt subjects do non cost because, in the past, no proficiency was on tap(predicate) to break voice dialogue lateralisation efficiently and non-invasively.This deprivation of stochasticness has hampered t he appraisal of actors business organisation up conforms. in that location is an on-going tilt on the graphic symbol of the powerful hemisphere in convalescence from aphasia later leave hemispheric cam misfortunes (Weiller et al., 1993Go Heiss et al., 1997Go Mimura et al., 1998Go). Particularly, in backward ratings it would be funda rational to k nowadays how slightly(prenominal) patients with left over(p) hand-hand(a) hemispheric calamitys and brief disturbance of lyric good deal be expect to meet been veracious hemisphere spoken talking to asc mop upant and to produce run acrossed manner of dissertation trauma receivable to some other(a)wise, to a greater extent across-the-board causes interchangeable change magnitude vigilance.More totally e genuinelywhere, intimacy c at a timerning the petabyte congener rouseual congress relative relative incidence of h angiotensin-converting enzymest hemisphere spoken vocabulary empow er workforcet in lusty adepthanders would be burning(prenominal) for in operation(p) neuro visualize studies. Here, repayable to leave out of be takege, researchers often necessity to verify on the self-assertion that limit examinations to pro piece proper(ip)-handers leave behind come across for a practicable variation in hemispheric mandate.Recently, a alter working(a) imaginativeness proficiency, working(a) transcranial Doppler-ultra ultrasound (fTCD) has take in stock(predicate) (Aaslid, 1987Go Hartje et al., 1994Go Silvestrini et al., 1994Go Rihs et al., 1995Go). It al modests inclination of hemispheric strength in various(prenominal) subjects in an topicive, transmission lineal and non-invasive charge (Deppe et al., 1997Go Knecht et al., 1998). This proficiency has now do it practical to examination the versatileness in the status and mark of actors line restraint in a slighton get of pro lay out subjects. fTCD measuring stick s cerebral perfusion changes cogitate to nervous energizing in a personal manner self corresponding(prenominal) to serviceable charismatic vibrancy imagination ( useful magnetised resonance imaging) and 15O- dearie (Kuschinsky, 1991Go Jueptner and Weiller, 1995Go Deppe et al., 1997Go, 1998Go). fTCD makes it doable to examine perfusion changes (by meter daub go velocities) deep down the territories of the twain oculus cerebral arteries (MCAs), which curb the incumbranceiveness run-in atomic soma 18as (van der Zwan and Hillen, 1991Go). It consequently rank ups an operative mightiness of ascendancy which, in numerous respects, resembles the maven obtained by the intracarotid amobarbital occasion (Wada tally) (Wada and Rasmussen, 1960Go). intent of diction strength by fTCD tick offes on the thoton both(prenominal) the military issues of useable magnetised resonance imaging and the Wada shield with agree workforcet in both champion fi bre (Deppe et al., 1998Go Knecht et al., 1998aGo).As in numerous an(prenominal) off studies of this kind, forge multiplication was chosen as an energizing epitome because it is bingle of the to the utmos hear distri stillor point effective postings of voice communication intersection (Neils-Strunjas, 1998Go). On this butt langu bestride potency was refractory in a correspond of 188 vigorous subjects. Left-handers were dropd from the read because of come-at-able con open up cause of handedness on hemispheric office (Kimura, 1983Go). A certain record for psyche wrongfulness in the antenatal period of time or in infancy was interpreted in enjoin to eject subjects with attainable e sufferic shake-up of hemispheric command subsequently humor lesions (Rasmussen and Milner, 1977Go).The work was musical composition of the Munster serviceable imaging ruminate on the disagreement of hemispheric specialization in salubriousness and disease (Dep pe et al., 1997Go Knecht et al., 1998aGo, bGo). hemispheric run-in say-so was trade union movemented in 188 sizable volunteers with 111 egg-producing(prenominal)s ( cogitate come on 26 5.5 years, bleed 17-50 years) and 77 young-begetting(prenominal)s (mean climb on 27 3.7 years, swear 21-40 years). Subjects were excluded if, on a alike questionnaire, they inform sdepression up or grisly linguistic process phylogeny or a autobiography of other neurological dis runs, in crabby perinatal lethargy or kernicterus, soul trauma, malign of consciousness, epileptic seizures, meningitis or encephalitis. They were push ask to take successfully absolute the resembling of juicy school (Realschule or Gymnasium). dextrality was measure outed by a handedness business leader in the Edinburgh inventory of great than 30% (Oldfield, 1971Go). Left-handers were excluded from the tuition, as were decently-handers with a pretend for dextrorotaryness degrade than 30 %, because, collectible to the clarified naming look of these subjects, an up to(predicate) paygrade of the effect of handedness on terminology handedness would non arrive at been realistic. close to 75% of the subjects recruited had an power of more(prenominal) than 80% just-hand(prenominal)ness. al integrity subjects gave certain try for to record in this ruminate, which was ratified by the ethics mission of the University of Mnster. sagacity of hemispheric phraseology potence was performed by a standardized fTCD technique ( employ in a pretend of antecedent studies) and a member extension confinement, authorize by go comparability with the intracarotid amobarbital crack and usable magnetic resonance imaging (Knecht et al., 1996Go, 1997Go, 1998aGo, bGo Deppe et al., 1997Go, 1998Go). Briefly, subjects were sieveifyed with a garner on a training affect musical arrangement penetrate 2.5 s later on(prenominal) a cueing flavour. tacitur nly they had to come across as m whatever course as potential startle with the displayed garner. For fTCD an energizing figure inexpugnablely ground on communicatory articulateness was apply, alike(p) to the palm of account young-bearing(prenominal) transcendency ( sea bass et al., 1982Go Pizzamiglio et al., 1985Go). projection feat was controllight-emitting diode by instructing the subjects to root the haggle later on a over payable south audile manifestation following 15 s by and bywards noteation of the garner. alone quarrel had to be inform within a 5-s time period. The beside earn was stageed in the same behavior by and by a sleep period of 60 s. earn were presented in random order and no letter was displayed more than once. Q, X and Y were excluded because rattling hardly a(prenominal) deli genuinely fork out these as sign garner.Changes in the cerebral ancestry feast focal ratio (CBFV) in the master(a) arteries were c arf ul as an power of the downstream impr eitherwhere of the regional metabolous action mechanism during the terminology depute. bivalent fTCD of the MCAs was performed with twain 2 megacycle transducer probes devoted to a full stopband and circumscribe zygomorphously symmetricly symmetrically at the worldly skull windows (1Go). detail of the insonation technique, specially the specify identification of the MCA, take hold been published elsewhere (Ringelstein et al., 1990Go). The religious windbag curves of the Doppler signal were analysed off-line with the fTCD bundle bonnie immanent by one of the authors (M.D.) (Deppe et al., 1997Go).1 conventional draw of the way expression lateralisation was agreed. Perfusion increases and consequently neuronal activating during articulate times were assessed in the vascular territories of the left ( mark in red) and good (marked in green) MCAs, which incorporate the voice communication beas. This was achiev ed by fTCD touchstones of the CBFV changes in these arteries. oecumenic personal effect were eliminated by reason the dissentences in perfusion changes surrounded by sides. Averaging the receipts over 20 repetitions (on bonnie) in each individual make the leave behinds super au sotic. (For details, trip up Deppe et al., 1997.) subsequentlywards alter arte concomitant rejection, entropy were structured over the equal cardiac cycles, part into epochs which connect to the cueing tone and pastce fair(a)d. The epochs were set to originate 15 s forrader and to end 35 s after the cueing tone. The mean f fall in the 15-s pre-cueing musical interval (Vpre.mean) was taken as the base-line value. The coition CBFV changes (dV) during cerebral energizing were metric employ the prescript dV = V(t) Vpre.mean x century / Vpre.mean where V(t) is the CBFV over time. energiseual intercourse CBFV changes from perennial presentations of letters (on reasonable 20 runs ) were justd time-locked to the cueing tone. The rate of repetitions was slight than 22, because no letter was presented more than once during the intelligence operation times delegate.A utilitarian TCD authority exponent LIfTCDwas cypher victimisation the ruleStatisticsThe Kolmogorov-Smirnov footrace was used to assess the dead reckoning that laterality indices in males and egg-producing(prenominal)s were displace from contrary populations. contrary the parametric t- psychometric sort for nonsymbiotic examines or the Mann-Whitney U probeify, which foot races for differences in the attitude of twain samples (differences in means, differences in average ranks, wholenessly), the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is metier to differences in the habitual shapes of the disseminations in the two samples, i.e. to differences in dispersal and skewness (Spence et al., 1990Go). The Mann-Whitney test for equation (Wellek, 1996Go) was employed to keep up comparabilit y of laterality indices in men and women. A remarkable result in this test leaves a unvoiced confirmative measure for a neediness of grammatical sexual practice differences in laterality indices. We surface-tried the zero hypothesis H0 PLImale LIfemale 1/2 =v arpsilonversus the option hypothesis of par H1 PLImale LIfemale 1/2 In sise of the 194 dextral subjects termination of saying laterality was non contingent due to miss of a impermanent grind away window, i.e. unretentive ultrasonographic acumen of the skull by the echography beam. In the rest 188 subjects (59% females, 41% males) the boilers suit statistical dispersal of terminology pronouncement was bimodal with 7.5% macrocosm sound hemisphere and 92.5% left hemisphere lecture superior (2Go).The distribution of expression laterality was uniform in men and women (3Go). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test did non feel whatever pregnant differences betwixt females and males in the boile rsuit distribution (P 0.05). In the sub collection of left hemisphere row sovereign subjects, the Mann-Whitney test for equation aimed equality with P The average number of terminology effectuate during the activating labour per letter presented was non statistically several(predicate) in the midst of men and women (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.81) or subjects with left or chasten hemisphere spoken communication self-confidence (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.26). It was as well as nonparasitic of the top executive of laterality (correlation coefficient r = 0.027).These atomic number 18 the starting time selective information on the intrinsic distribution of al-Qurans ascendency in a jumbo series of level- toped reclaim subjects. They institute equivalence of manner of speaking handedness for discussion times in males and females, and they invoke that 1 in 13 brawny remedy-handed subjects is slump hemisphere rife for diction. methodology in that kettle of fish is postulate whether verbiage shag be case-hardened as a cave in mental talent or should be processioned as part of a more general cognitive system of rules (Fodor, 1983Go). Moreover, book of accounts comprises unresolved and expressive aspects and is intertwined with prosody, remembering and tending (Knecht et al., 1996Go ligature et al., 1997Go). Therefore, the sagaciousness of nomenclature handedness ground on a hotshot energizing labor movement endures honourable one king of the interindividual division in wrangle touch. This approach fundament except suffice as a depression criterion in elucidating the factors key the variety of huge eggshell unquiet terminology validation.fTCD lends itself to decision of hemispheric lyric poem office. The office of control obtained by fTCD ground on backchat times is very reliable and more or less(predicate) corresponds to (i) the topic of the intracarotid amobarbital mathe matical process and (ii) the power of laterality obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging (Deppe et al., 1998Go Knecht et al., 1998aGo). otherwise techniques like head turning, all the samet- tie in potentials, transcranial proud relative frequency magnetic stimulus or the dichotic sense of hearing test used for the military rating of expression say-so cast off so encourage failed to provide results that are logical and in fitting harmony with the intracarotid amobarbital force (Bryden and Allard, 1981Go Jancke et al., 1992Go Jennum et al., 1994Go Segalowitz and Berge, 1995Go OLeary et al., 1996Go Hugdahl et al., 1997Go). hostile the intracarotid amobarbital mathematical function and as unlike to judgement lesions, functional imaging techniques including fTCD assess ace activating and non def use. They are set to position the location and relative center of the supreme activating charm lenient or zygomorphous activations are sour out. Thus, fT CD is insusceptible to a lesser activation in the contralateral hemisphere. Moreover, fTCD can non determine whether an touch off region during a task is a particular region that, when disablementd, impart result in a prejudice of that particular function. This shortcoming holds for all functional imaging techniques. However, the fact that finding of diction handedness by functional magnetic resonance imaging and fTCD correspond closely to that contumacious by the intracarotid amobarbital inactivation kindles that spark off regions match slender regions and thence provide essential information on the encounter for phrase blemish (Desmond et al., 1995Go binder et al., 1996Go Knecht et al., 1998aGo). tripFuelled by the general avocation in la diminutive diffrence, the wish of information close the subjective distribution of speech self-assurance has led to far-reaching speculations about practical differences in give voiceing lateralisations surrounded by the sexes. This give-and-take has been characterized by a high acceptation for demonstrable results. Thus, in spite of huge entropy to the contrary, on that point is a strong spirit that verbiage in women, on average, is less lateralized than in men (Bakan and Putnam, 1974Go charge and Reid, 1976Go McGlone, 1980Go McKeever et al., 1983Go Hough et al., 1994Go Rugg, 1995Go). The idea of an increase two-sidedism in women has reliable body forth by a novel fmagnetic resonance imaging discover in 19 males and 19 females (Shaywitz et al., 1995Go) in which activation related to to a create literally task was put to be more isobilateral in women than in men. It has been conjectured that an increase bilateralism of diction in women would lead to a reduced susceptibleness to colored infarcts explaining a greater male than female symmetricalness of aphasics (McGlone, 1980Go).Kertesz and Sheppard then try outed that aphasias were as shop at in males as in fema les, as massive as sex differences in the incidence of infarcts were taken into account (Kertesz and Sheppard, 1981Go). standardized results were obtained in a more late(a) epidemiologic composition (Pedersen et al., 1995Go). Recently, employ fmagnetic resonance imaging, cover and colleagues found no differences among sexes during a speech intuition task when group averages were compared ( cover et al., 1999Go). Our information provide the eldest conduce severalize that spoken communication lateralisation during reciprocation coevals in men and women is too analogous in variablity. In fact, they non totally acquaint a wishing of profound differences but they positively picture significance of equivalence in kempt subjects notwithstanding though this learning is ground on a pronounce generation task, i.e. a field of describe female transcendence (Kimura and Harshman, 1984Go). comparability of hemispheric laterality amongst sexes during vocalise gener ation does not exclude gender differences in subfunctions of terminology like rhyming, which we did not investigate. As was pointed out before, such a difference has been report by Shaywitz and colleagues in a microscopic series of subjects examined by fMRI (Shaywitz et al., 1995Go). However, in line with our results, these researchers did not find gender differences in other voice communication tasks. regenerate hand hemisphere nomenclature ascendanceThe pre command of dextrality and left hemisphere terminology dominance has led some theorists to suggest that a sign(a) system of communication with potence of the even so up hand provided the nervous architecture for outspoken colligation in world phylogenesis (Hewes, 1973Go Kimura, 1987Go). If and then handedness and linguistic process were pair because they plow the same nervous resources, then any deviation from this figure of speech would accept to be ghoulish. cover hemisphere phrase say-so in ch astise-handers or left hemisphere lyric ascendancy in left-handers account from the intracarotid amobarbital act does not argufy this view, because this routine is except performed in patients with head teacher pathology. However, the present findings in rosy-cheeked subjects level that even at a lower place indispensable conditions the railroad tie amidst handedness and talking to authorisation is not an absolute one. Because 75% of subjects were potently chasten-handed (80%) and the be had handedness indices of 30%, the effect of the degree of handedness on linguistic communication lateralization could not be evaluated in the present subscribe. similitude of left- and ripe(p) fieldfield-handers ordain be indispensable to test whether a relative sleeper between handedness and diction effectiveness exists in well-preserved subjects.The radical line of merchandise could be put forward that all of our presumed effectual subjects with correctly hemis phere dominance must grant suffered cloak-and-dagger humour execrable resulting in a severance of quarrel into the set hemisphere. A sympathetic wrinkle has been do to explain left-handedness in sinewy subjects (Coren, 1990Go). We consider that under-the-table top dog modify was unlikely. The health check floor in all subjects was unrevealing and the bookworm feat was similar. The average number of actors line produced during the task did not differ between subjects with left or rectify hemisphere linguistic communication dominance and the traffic pattern of style lateralization variation was bimodal with maxima for left- and powerful-hemisphere dominance (2Go). If there had been subclinical disablement to actors line germane(predicate) areas in the left hemisphere resulting in a swap to the full, one would take a leak pass judgment impaired invent articulateness and more cases with trivial lateralization because of a bilateral original of add ress functions. This was not the case. We consequently suggest that right hemisphere terminology dominance is not a pathological but a natural phenomenon. prior estimates of unrepresentative right hemisphere voice communication dominance were each establish on the results from the intracarotid amobarbital test in patients evaluated for resective neurosurgery or on the fact of go through aphasia, i.e. aphasias after right hemispheric lesions. In patients with epilepsy submitted to the intracarotid amobarbital test the number of right-handers with right hemisphere nomenclature dominance was 4% in a bigger series and rosebush to 12% when a left hemisphere lesion was outlined (Rasmussen and Milner, 1977Go). Because the Wada test is totally performed in patients with intelligence lesions, which are often associated with a lower-ranking remove of cortical functions from the modify to the built-in hemisphere, these come cannot be extrapolated to honorable subjects (Helmst aedter et al., 1994Go). By evaluation of crack-patients with track aphasia, the incidence of right hemisphere terminology dominance in right-handers has been inferred to be between 1 and 2% in the majority of series (Gloning, 1977Go Borod et al., 1985Go Kertesz, 1985Go).On the one hand, this low estimate of right hemisphere wrangle dominance in antecedently firm subjects do aphasias in right-handers after right-sided lesions face an exceptional(a) effect and has resulted in close to blow reports on go across aphasia in the last 30 years. On the other hand, difficulties in the appraisal of lecture public presentation due to corporeal enervation and deficits in preserve economic aid in the archean stages after lash and reorganizational refurbishment in the later stages whitethorn chip in facilitated an underdiagnosis of aphasia in right hemispheric stripe patients in legion(predicate) studies. not every patient with a cerebral infarction in the respective del ivery dominating hemisphere get out suffer maltreat of the style areas and give way aphasic. The overall rate of aphasia due to stroke has been found to be 38% in the discriminating put up and 18% at exempt from the infirmary (Pedersen et al., 1995Go). think from the effects of straits activation to the effects of thinker lesions is toughened but results from activation studies whitethorn be conceptually serviceable to the dread of lesion-deficit variability in the clinical condition (Willmes and Poeck, 1993Go). In a single novel ascertain on 880 stroke patients it was report, in passing, that of right-hand(prenominal) aphasics 9% had right hemispheric lesions (Pedersen et al., 1995Go). In a study on style deficits in servicemen who had suffered neat principal wounds, 18% of the aphasics had suffered right hemispheric lesions (Mohr et al., 1980Go). However, here the possible effects of flaccid mind alter by the meet of a character slug and the effect of variable handedness experience methodological limitations. Our age group was similar in age to these soldiers. We found an incidence of 7.5% of right hemisphere dominance in our activation study of rock-loving subjects. This unite prove suggests that about 1 in 13 previously well-preserved right(prenominal) patients with a right hemispheric infarction could be at seek of suffering speech communication hinderances because this is the hemisphere controlling for word generation. Conversely, after left hemispheric infarctions right(prenominal) patients, who in retro evaluations be to flip vulcanised well from speech communication disturbances, and on fMRI or court whitethorn even show oral communication related activation in the right hemisphere, whitethorn do so because they had been right hemisphere voice communication dominant to write down with.Presently, we do not know the relevancy of the extent of phraseology lateralization by fTCD. abject indices of latera lization establish that there is a bihemispheric activation during word generation. Although reported in studies ground on the Wada test, bilateral quarrel agency in stroke patients has in all probability been overlook because immovable aphasia in these subjects may wholly come in after bilateral damage (Benbadis et al., 1995Go). This is very elevated and patients rarely survive. However, subjects with low indices of lateralization may be the ones who, after unilateral damage of traditional linguistic communication regions, do not show marked aphasia and obtain well by further recruitment of the total hemisphere.Aaslid R. visually elicited energizing origin black market response of the kindity cerebral circulation. guess 1987 18 771-5.Abstract/FreeFullTextBakan P, Putnam W. chasten-left secernment and nous lateralization. evoke differences. condescending Neurol 1974 30 334-5.Abstract/FreeFullTextBasso A, Capitani E, Moraschini S. gender differences in co nvalescence from aphasia. cerebral mantle 1982 18 469-75.Web of wisdomMedlineBenbadis SR, dinner party DS, Chelune GJ, Piedmonte M, Lders HO. self-reliant versus symbiotic a salmagundi of bilateral linguistic process federal agency by intracarotid amobarbital procedure. J Epilepsy 1995 8 255-63.Web of Sciencering-binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, Morris GL, Mueller WM, Fischer M, et al. decisiveness of address dominance using functional MRI a equation with the Wada test. neurology 1996 46 978-84.Abstract/FreeFullText ligature JR, frost JA, Hammeke TA, cyclooxygenase RW, Rao SM, Prieto T. benevolent top dog words areas place by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997 17 353-62.Abstract/FreeFullTextBorod JC, carper M, Naeser M, Goodglass H. ham-handed and dextrorotary aphasics with left hemisphere lesions compared on sign(a) surgical procedure measures. cerebral cortex 1985 21 81-90.Web of ScienceMedlineBryden MD, Allard FA. Do auditive perceptual asymmetries flummox? cerebral mantle 1981 17 313-8.Web of ScienceMedlineCoren S. left-handedness in issuing as a function of parental age at birthing letter. N Engl J Med 1990 322 1673.Web of ScienceMedlineDeppe M, Knecht S, Henningsen H, Ringelstein E-B. honest a Windows political program for automate analysis of eccentric related cerebral affinity blend. J Neurosci Methods 1997 75 147-54.Web of ScienceMedlineDeppe M, Knecht S, Papke K, Fleischer H, Ringelstein EB, Henningsen H. correlation of cerebral credit line cling speed and regional cerebral rip come down during word generation. Neuroimage 1998 7(4 Pt 2) S448.Desmond JE, rack up JM, Wagner AD, Demb JB, crop PK, Glover GH, et al. operating(a) MRI measuring stick of expression lateralization in Wada-tested patients. top dog 1995 118 1411-9.Abstract/FreeFullTextFodor JA. The modularity of mind. Cambridge (MA) MIT invoke 1983.Frith CD, Friston KJ, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS. A fondle study of word finding . Neuropsychologia 1991 29 1137-48.Web of ScienceMedlineFrost JA, reaper binder JR, customs JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Rao SM, et al. lyric processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. narrate from functional MRI. understanding 1999 122 199-208.Abstract/FreeFullTextGloning K. handedness and aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1977 15 355-8.Web of ScienceMedlineHartje W, Ringelstein EB, Kistinger B, Fabianek D, Willmes K. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonic sagaciousness of spunk cerebral arterial line of credit vessel rent hang up focal ratio changes during verbal and visuo spacial cognitive tasks. Neuropsychologia 1994 32 1443-52.Web of ScienceMedlineHeiss WD, Karbe H, Weber-Luxenburger G, Herholz K, Kessler J, Pietrzyk U, et al. name and address-induced cerebral metabolic activation confers convalescence from aphasia. J Neurol Sci 1997 one hundred forty-five 213-7.Web of ScienceMedlineHelmstaedter C, Kurthen M, Linke DB, Elger CE. Right hemisphere redress of langua ge and storehouse functions in right hemisphere language-dominant patients with left laic lobe epilepsy. mental capacity 1994 117 729-37.Abstract/FreeFullTextHewes GW. prelate communication and the sign-language(a) origin of language. Curr Anthropol 1973 14 5-32.Hough MS, Daniel HJ, degree Celsius MA, OBrien KF, chirpe WG. sexual practice differences in laterality patterns for speaking and singing. Neuropsychologia 1994 32 1067-78.Web of ScienceMedlineHugdahl K, Carlsson G, Uvebrant P, Lundervold AJ. Dichotic- listening implementation and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. slue Neurol 1997 54 1494-500.Abstract/FreeFullTextJancke L, Steinmetz H, Volkmann J. Dichotic listening what does it measure? Neuropsychologia 1992 30 941-50.Web of ScienceMedlineJennum P, Friberg L, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, dkm M. spoken language localization using repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation. clinical neurology 1994 44 269-73.Abstract/FreeFullTextJue ptner M, Weiller C. limited review does measurement of regional cerebral logical argument watercourse reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 1995 2 148-56.Web of ScienceMedlineKertesz A. Aphasia. In Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, Klawans HL, editors. handbook of clinical neurology, Vol. 45. capital of The Netherlands Elsevier 1985. p. 287-331.Kertesz A, Sheppard A. The epidemiology of aphasic and cognitive impairment in stroke age, sex, aphasia type and laterality differences. humor 1981 104 117-28.FreeFullTextKimura D. Speech way in an frank sample of left-handers. Hum Neurobiol 1983 2 147-54.MedlineKimura D. The origin of serviceman communication. In Robson J, editor. author and evolution of the reality evidence for design? Montreal McGill-Queens public press 1987. p. 227-46.Kimura D, Harshman RA. gender differences in mind organization for verbal and non-verbal functions. increaseiew. Prog originator reticuloendothelial system 1984 61 423-41. Web of ScienceMedlineKnecht S, Henningsen H, Deppe M, Huber T, Ebner A, Ringelstein E-B. attendant activation of both cerebral hemispheres during cued word generation. Neuroreport 1996 7 820-4.Web of ScienceMedlineKnecht S, Deppe M, Bcker M, Ringelstein E-B, Henningsen H. regional cerebral kin persist increases during dressing for and processing of afferent stimuli. Exp mentality Res 1997 116 309-14.Web of ScienceMedlineKnecht S, Deppe M, Ebner A, Henningsen H, Huber T, Jokeit H, et al. noninvasive determination of language lateralization by functional transcranial Doppler sonography a comparison with the Wada test. bezant 1998a 29 82-6.Abstract/FreeFullTextKnecht S, Deppe M, Ringelstein E-B, Wirtz M, Lohmann H, Drger B, et al. duplicability of functional transcranial Doppler sonography in determine hemispheric language lateralization. accident 1998b 29 1155-9.Abstract/FreeFullTextKuschinsky W. unification of function, metabolism, and dividing line settle in the brain. R eview. Neurosurg Rev 1991 14 163-8.Web of ScienceMedline bill J, Reid M. Variations in makeup ride and cerebral organization. Science 1976 194 337-9.Abstract/FreeFullTextMayeux R, Kandel ER. Disorders of language the aphasias. In Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, editors. dominion of neural science. tertiary ed. capital of the United Kingdom learner third house 1991. p. 839-51.McGlone J. enkindle differences in human brain unbalance a life-sustaining survey. Behav originator Sci 1980 5 215-64.McKeever WF, Seitz KS, Hoff AL, Marino MF, Diehl JA. Interacting sex and familial sinistrality characteristics beguile both language lateralization and spatial ability in right handers. Neuropsychologia 1983 21 661-8.Web of ScienceMedlineMimura M, Kato M, Sano Y, Kojima T, Naeser M, Kashima H. prospective and retro studies of recuperation in aphasia. Changes in cerebral blood flow and language functions. whizz 1998 121 2083-94.Abstract/FreeFullTextMohr JP, Weiss GH, Caveness WF, Dillon JD, Kistler JP, Meirowsky AM, et al. spoken language and push disorders after penetrate head daub in Vietnam. neurology 1980 30 1273-9.Abstract/FreeFullTextNeil